DVDon't
We bought a DVD the other day.
/* */
1-3/8" diameter, 7/16" bore. With ferrules and caps. Will fit all makes.
We bought a DVD the other day.
Our team Christmas lunch this year was at Ronnie Scott's jazz club, where you can enjoy an afternoon of food and wine accompanied by sets from three different performers (credit to Dei, our editor, for this inspired idea!) We heard a piano trio, then a great tenor saxophonist and finally a female vocalist, who really whipped the audience up into a festive frenzy, especially with her versions of classic Christmas numbers done in the musical style of the audience's choosing (the dub reggae 'Silent Night' was hilarious). It was a pretty tremendous way to spend an afternoon.
Dude that was class - best bit was the arty pause so you could neck some more wine!
If only we knew you had such mad skillz at Chateau Giggles, we could've broadcast Kazoo Aid to the world
Nice work!
Spotted a poster on the tube at Moorgate for new film 'Harry Brown' starring the legendary Michael Caine. Looks like another great British urban movie which I hope to be able to check out sooner rather than later, but the killer for me is this awesome bit of driving drum & bass over the credits from Plan B (who also stars in the film...) with Chase And Status:
Those of you with psychology degrees may well scoff knowingly but I found this a most fascinating twenty minutes or so:
Labels: cool, psychology, TED, video
That was brilliant!
The best optical illusion was that I could have sworn that he had the three top buttons on his shirt undone, but nobody in their right mind would have done that after 1979...
It made me think of this: http://www.gamboling.co.uk/2007/04/is-this-some-kind-of-joke.html
So it all starts again today with a 5.30pm kick-off away at Everton. Now this is by no means an Arsenal blog - there are many that fulfil that role way better than I could) but I do chip in from time to time when something piques my interest. Like this, the Arsenal Pledge (I've always been more of a Mr Sheen man myself):
Burial and Four Tet have collaborated on a 12″ release, each apparently having had a hand in the production of each others tracks; a fantastic 'style-meld' from two of my favourite producers.
No, not the leathery perma-tanned Centre Court crooner but a beautiful track from my man-of-the-week Mike Skinner.
Neat! I didn't know what Mike Skinner looks like.
/thanks for the shout out as well, fourstar!
Cool video. I liked the music and the changes in the room and in the singer. What kept bothering me more and more was that the longer the guy's beard got, the more his bad teeth showed up! Now why is that?
Love this video,cool.;D
Hope to see more from you.
http://www.soloden.com
that is actually very disturbing on many, many levels.
not at all sure I know what they are trying to say, or encourage.
very odd indeed
OK, so Eduardo's cheeky volley was good, but this lot are incredible:
Amazing ball skills!
Top site by the way. Would you be able to email me when you get the chance?
Thanks a lot,
Thomas
"Would you be able to email me when you get the chance?"
Do I know you?
I recently heard this on Mad Decent radio and Sinden's podcast, gave it props on blip.fm, which instantly Twittered it and now I'm embedding the YouTube on my blog. How ridiculously Web2.0 is that?
You sound like you know what you are talking about. Will you come over and re-design my website for me. For free. I will make you green tea and stroke your curly blonde hair while you do it?
Ah. At this point, I feel I should confess that I'm not a natural blonde.
That's the daughter of June Ackland off of The Bill, y'know.
Tsk, Clair - been reading popbitch again when you are supposed to be working in your new and exciting job?
And do we think June Ackland is a natural blonde?
Feel free to ignore this post if you are over the age of fifteen, or have a life, or both. It will make no sense to you. Run away now.
The same internet machine that could propel you to the top of the Youtube charts and hand you online fame will happily chew you up and spit you back out just as quickly, with zero remorse or consideration for the consequences. This is the reality of the internet today, this case is not the first, and surely not the last. Catie, at least, well and truly learnt the power of the world wide web. Somehow, I doubt that will be of much consolation to her.Utterly. Bonkers.
From the comments:
"Best. Story. EVER.."
Someone needs to get out more.
ps: is it bad that I hardly understood a word?
It's a relief that you hardly understood a word.
That is very good. I have a feeling my girlfriend's summary would probably be worse.
This is also very funny:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_qEWhrjYg_o
Brilliant idea. Who would have thought it, eh? Fans of your oeuvre might want a place to go to get high-quality versions of your archived work. Amazing. Yes, we might even click a few ads and buy a few DVDs, T-shirts and the like.
Another fantastic Danny Baker moment - a version of Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody with every word replaced by a footballer's name. Why? Just because. Listen:
This guy is hilarious, I really like 'Squeaky' Stevie G and the fact that it's apparently been recorded in Lidl:
Eh, what's up with 'im? Calm down, he's just talking that Lidl (and that).
J'aime ceci beaucoup:
Labels: musiq, The French, video
Following on from this and this, come the (renegade) masters of the bleedin' obvious with this:
“What you can’t do is substitute someone else’s creativity for your own.”No, that would be stealing. But there is a long history of putting bits and pieces and sounds together and calling it musique concrete, no? So who decides how much is a substantial part and how much is just a relatively insignificant bit of a larger work - that has to be the courts. This could get interesting, if someone really wants to challenge him. It's not just one (highly recognisable) sample looped over and over whilst MC Thingummy does his schtick over the top - this is possibly a new genre.
After offmessage posted about the brilliant Girl Talk mashup album, 'Feed The Animals' (well worth checking out if you can still find it) there are now video versions of a couple of sections of it which have popped up on YouTube:
There are some moderately important football matches being played this afternoon so I thought this might get us in the mood:
Whilst I generally leave the Freyja updates to Solveig, as she does them so much better than me, I couldn't help but feel I ought to bring this to the attention of my fellow gadget-loving dads (=>'dadgets'?):
Asus Eee + BBC iPlayer + cBeebies = Bye bye, Daddy; see you later.No, I don't know what it stands for, but I like it:
Well. I saw them on Later and really liked 'em. The album has just arrived, I've put it on in the office and have been roundly abused ever since it started. They are, it has to be said, phillistines, but I have a feeling I'll be listening to this one at home more than at work...
Arsenal striker Eduardo Alves da Silva is 25 today.
the video doesn't work anymore. I've seen pictures of the break, and the point at which Taylor's foot connects with Eduardo's leg, which is quite enough, thank you.
just a point for thought; if Eduardo had ended up with merely a bruised ankle, would you still be calling for Taylor to strung up? probably not, just calling him various names and being happy with his punishment. and the majority of studs-in tackles don't result in a break, they are v v rare.
I'm of the opinion that someone shouldn't be punished more than another player because his tackle resulted in a break rather than bruising. IMO, its the intent and the application of the tackle that is punishable, not the result - rather like a professional foul, if you will.
Thanks, I'll sort the link (or get rid of it, nasty...)
It's not that I'm calling for him to be strung up, I think we need to eradicate the studs-in tackle from the game altogether, from bruising to compound fractures.
So yes, I therefore agree with your last point, in that the punishment should be consistent, but I think it should be much, much heavier for this kind of foul. It might take a bit of time, seeing as it is so ingrained into the English game, but if players were going to be missing for weeks rather than days, managers might think twice before condoning it.
don't they have the ability to make a ban last longer than the usual 3 games? maybe all dangerous tackles should be submitted to the FA disciplinary committee as a matter of course.
anyway, a v bad result of a dangerous tackle whatever.
That is a good question; where does a red card foul stop and dangerous play (a la Ben Thatcher on Pedro Mendes) begin. If the referee has been seen to deal with it at the time, does the panel have any say over length of ban? I'm sure this will be clarified in the media over the coming days...
if i may just play devil's advocate here for a moment (me? what a surprise!). whilst it was obviously a horrible, dangerous tackle, the idea that the player should be banned for life, or that it this incident is due to the frequently wenger-espoused theory that other teams can't compete with arsenal so they kick them, is, i think, a bit over the top.
such incidents are a regrettable part of football. the rules exist to try and prevent them, but ultimately, in the heat of the moment, terrible misjudgements are made. as you are no doubt aware, there have been 3 or 4 such incidents since the "orginal" david busst 12 years ago. Alan Smith and Cisse being the highest profile (and incidentally both are still playing at a high level - your opinion on newcastle notwithstanding). There doesn't seem to be a anything to suggest that this happens to arsenal more often than anybody else and in fact arsenal players are just as guilty of dangerous play - take Flamini's petulant 15 ft lunge at Nani in the FA cup, arguably a worse tackle due to the obvious intent and one of your "potentially career ending challenges" analysed on MOTD. or any of eboue's rasher moments. the point is that whilst players often decide to try a "strong" challenge, i would argue there are probably no cases where a player sets out to cause such a horrific injury. they are a sad fact of footballing life and as ever, mr "rent-a-quote" wenger has done a good deal of stirring which in this case is totally inappropriate. making the same comments in 4 different interviews is not "in the heat of the moment" and if you have to "retract" what you say, that means you know you should be apologising and don't have the balls. hope eduardo recovers as quickly as Cisse did and i hope referees start applying the laws more consistantly so players know they have no chance of getting away with even trying that sort of challenge. but when they do - witch hunts help no one and arsene making press mileage out of it is, to me, almost as distasteful as the incident itself.
I'm sorry (no, I'm not really) and yes, I know you're playing devil's advocate, but I completely disagree with your "regrettable part of football" idea. There is no need for that kind of tackle; end of story. It simply cannot be a "terrible misjudgement" to go in studs up, shin high. So, by increasing the level of punishment, both players and managers will have to take a good look at their tactics and decide whether it is worth losing a key member of your squad for a long part of the season. Yes, of course I include Arsenal in that; Flamini, Eboué and the rest would all have to abide by the rules. I want it out of the game, not just out of our opponents armoury.
Also, surely the three you mention were genuine freak accidents; David Busst collided with Irwin in the 6-yard box, Alan Smith was caught off the ground (unwisely) blocking a Riise free kick and Cissé got his studs caught in the pitch. I think I would be right in saying that in none of those cases was anyone sent off. That, to me, seems rather important here.
Putting aside the "banned for life" bit, which was heat of the moment, whatever you may think, I think it does take balls to retract a comment, especially in the partisan world of top level football. Today's news is tomorrow's chip-paper; you can wait for it to blow over if you fancy, and it generally will. I don't think it is a witch hunt at all, certainly not against Martin Taylor (who, to his credit, has asked to be able to visit Eduardo when the latter feels it is appropriate) but it very much now falls to the FA to listen to the less hysterical parts of the media (James Lawton in the Independent springs to mind) and decide whether the future of the game would be better served without this kind of dangerous, unsportsmanlike challenge.
Fair?
Goodplaya also speaks some sense on this issue.
Sense + FA = DOES NOT COMPUTE!
> Fair?
oh absolutely. and i don't mean to imply that just because they are a "part of football" that we shouldn't make every effort to minimise such tackles or that there shouldn't be appropriate penaties for reckless tackles. what i mean is there will always be the possibility of such an occurance no matter what the rules or particular intention of a player.
and you're right, the injuries i mentioned were not as a result of dangerous tackles, but in a way that's also my point (and i'm dangerously close to agreeing with Rowan here): you see a lot of tackles like the one that taylor made, but injuries like this are very rare, and when they do happen, it's just as likely to be a freakish accident.
anyway - it was only really St Wenger the Blind that wound me up as i happened to catch all 4 different versions of his now rightly retracted comments.
> there will always be the possibility of such an occurance
And the chance of such an injury would be lessened if people didn't make dangerous tackles. Out of the four we mentioned, one was a dangerous tackle, so removing that possibility would reduce the chances of such an injury by 25%.
Yeah, I know that's not how the math(s) works in real life, but hey! this is the internet :)
The ref creates a really odd situation in football because if he decides something then the FA can't wade in afterwards (or not easily).
As an impartial observer I often hear the two sides arguing along the lines of "ban him" and "the FA can't do anything because it would undermine the ref".
Fine it stops rash judgements and "banned for life" situations. But somehow it always seems to stop anything changing too.
Why can't the FA say, "we aren't going to ban Martin Taylor because the the rules weren't clear. But not this tragedy has happened we want to make it clear from here forward that you'll get automatically banned for a season if you tackle somebody and your foot causes their bones to no longer be inside their legs".
Or perhaps you could ban the player for the same length of time as recovery takes?
That last idea is a great one - until you realise that unscrupulous teams would have even more reason to feign injury and get a man sent off, thus banning him until the 'injured' player deems himself fit to play again. Sling on your worst centre back with 5 mins to go, go down in a heap, Ronaldo/Fabregas/Gerrard/Lampard sent off for nothing, misses...oooh...the rest of the season, if they fancy.
OK, so the FA could appoint doctors to check on the health of the....it gets a bit complicated, don't it :)
But I did like it at first!
Martin Samuel also talking sense in The Times.
6 Comments:
I have exactly the same issue - am a member of Lovefilm and have lost count of number of times I've been sent DVDs that either won't play in DVD player or stop halfway through, but then work fine on laptop, even though they're correct region etc for player. Especially annoying as laptop screen is small and not ideal at all for watcihng films ono.
we've not had this problem with our new dvd player although it was a fairly regular feature of our old one, purchased about 10 years ago.
I don't want to sound paranoid, but you should check your laptop for spyware. Remember the Sony rootkit scandal? Could it be possible that the disk was only intended to play on a DVD drive with access to an OS on which it's relatively easy to execute arbitrary code?
Hmm, interesting - thanks people.
Dazzla - yes, you sound paranoid :)
Hah. Well at least I have a DVD player made in this century ;)
Ours is a Toshiba, purchased in late-2008.
Maddening.
Add comment
<< Home