/* */

fork handles

1-3/8" diameter, 7/16" bore. With ferrules and caps. Will fit all makes.

Tuesday, March 09, 2010


DVDon't

We bought a DVD the other day.

Solveig was in Sainsbury's and saw Thomas And The Magic Railroad* was on offer for four quid, so she picked one up for the kids. Upon arrival, she (or more probably Theo) popped it into the DVD player and pressed PLAY. Nothing happened. She ejected it, blew off any dust and had another go. Nowt. Just the dreaded "Loading..." icon in the top right corner of the screen. Cue disappointed kids and the return of Peppa Pig to our screens.

We took it back and exchanged it, assuming the disc was faulty in some way. But the replacement was exactly the same, refusing even to load the disc, let alone actually play. Short of believing there was a batch of discs with a manufacturing defect, I was curious to see if the disc would work in a computer drive, rather than our standard domestic DVD player. So I popped it into a laptop and it worked fine. No other DVDs have ever failed to work in the normal player. Weird.

Figuring that making a copy of something that doesn't actually work wouldn't really be breaking any laws, I set to with ripping it. Obviously it has the latest copy protection; not a massive problem, there are ways and means. Less than an hour later, we have a working copy of the film which runs perfectly in the DVD player and the kids are happy.

But what kind of industry cripples its media so much that a standard domestic player cannot even read it? And isn't that now the opposite of the problem we used to have with CDs, whereby copy-protected discs wouldn't play in PC data drives but were fine in regular audio CD players?

Somebody somewhere needs to have a damned good think...

* dreadful Americanised 'Polar Express'-lite set on Sodor - don't bother :)

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

At March 09, 2010 3:58 PM, Blogger Jamie said:

I have exactly the same issue - am a member of Lovefilm and have lost count of number of times I've been sent DVDs that either won't play in DVD player or stop halfway through, but then work fine on laptop, even though they're correct region etc for player. Especially annoying as laptop screen is small and not ideal at all for watcihng films ono.

 
At March 09, 2010 4:24 PM, Blogger Rowan said:

we've not had this problem with our new dvd player although it was a fairly regular feature of our old one, purchased about 10 years ago.

 
At March 09, 2010 5:21 PM, Blogger Dazzla said:

I don't want to sound paranoid, but you should check your laptop for spyware. Remember the Sony rootkit scandal? Could it be possible that the disk was only intended to play on a DVD drive with access to an OS on which it's relatively easy to execute arbitrary code?

 
At March 10, 2010 11:51 AM, Blogger fourstar said:

Hmm, interesting - thanks people.

Dazzla - yes, you sound paranoid :)

 
At March 10, 2010 9:15 PM, Blogger Dazzla said:

Hah. Well at least I have a DVD player made in this century ;)

 
At March 10, 2010 10:29 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

Ours is a Toshiba, purchased in late-2008.

Maddening.

 

Add comment

<< Home

Tuesday, February 02, 2010


Stuffie?

I blipped this, but it's worth pushing again.

Uffie + Starkey = Massssssssssive tune.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Wednesday, December 23, 2009


All That Jazz

Our team Christmas lunch this year was at Ronnie Scott's jazz club, where you can enjoy an afternoon of food and wine accompanied by sets from three different performers (credit to Dei, our editor, for this inspired idea!) We heard a piano trio, then a great tenor saxophonist and finally a female vocalist, who really whipped the audience up into a festive frenzy, especially with her versions of classic Christmas numbers done in the musical style of the audience's choosing (the dub reggae 'Silent Night' was hilarious). It was a pretty tremendous way to spend an afternoon.

However, part of the deal is that everyone joins in for a big number at the end on kazoos (nicely laid out with the cutlery at each place setting). This was great fun, but even better was when they asked for volunteers to come up for a jam on the famous Ronnie Scott's stage, which has been graced by innumerable all-star names from the music world, past and present.

I didn't need asking twice, but I did let Jeremy go first for a microphone level test; old habits die hard. What's that? Is there a recording of this spectacular event? I thought you'd never ask:



And massive thanks to Alex for his off-the-cuff iPhone camerawork :)

Labels: , , , , ,

2 Comments:

At December 23, 2009 3:49 PM, Blogger RubberGoat said:

Dude that was class - best bit was the arty pause so you could neck some more wine!

 
At December 24, 2009 5:20 PM, Blogger Jason said:

If only we knew you had such mad skillz at Chateau Giggles, we could've broadcast Kazoo Aid to the world

Nice work!

 

Add comment

<< Home

Friday, November 27, 2009


First person...

...to hack into Peter Mandelson's home internet connection and download an illegal torrent of Transformers 2 using his account, wins a date with Megan Fox.

Get to it, geek squadron.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

1 Comments:

At November 27, 2009 12:46 PM, Blogger RubberGoat said:

Excellent stuff!

 

Add comment

<< Home

Monday, November 23, 2009


Harry Up

Spotted a poster on the tube at Moorgate for new film 'Harry Brown' starring the legendary Michael Caine. Looks like another great British urban movie which I hope to be able to check out sooner rather than later, but the killer for me is this awesome bit of driving drum & bass over the credits from Plan B (who also stars in the film...) with Chase And Status:

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Wednesday, October 14, 2009


Colour Me Amazed

Those of you with psychology degrees may well scoff knowingly but I found this a most fascinating twenty minutes or so:

Labels: , , ,

1 Comments:

At October 23, 2009 10:25 PM, Blogger RubberGoat said:

That was brilliant!

The best optical illusion was that I could have sworn that he had the three top buttons on his shirt undone, but nobody in their right mind would have done that after 1979...

 

Add comment

<< Home

Tuesday, October 06, 2009


Four Local Gay Parrots Go For A Pint

More Mitchell & Webb genius (and splendidly on topic for my little corner of the blogosphere)

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

At October 07, 2009 1:02 PM, Blogger Alex Andronov said:

It made me think of this: http://www.gamboling.co.uk/2007/04/is-this-some-kind-of-joke.html

 

Add comment

<< Home

Saturday, August 15, 2009


Kicking Off

So it all starts again today with a 5.30pm kick-off away at Everton. Now this is by no means an Arsenal blog - there are many that fulfil that role way better than I could) but I do chip in from time to time when something piques my interest. Like this, the Arsenal Pledge (I've always been more of a Mr Sheen man myself):


All well and good, but where are all the other players?

I want to see Fabianski's pledge to not come charging out of his goal like a freak every five minutes, Song's pledge to look less like he smoked a massive reefer before putting his shin-pads in and Eboué's pledge to be a bit less Eboué (or should that be fewer Eboué...)

Anyway, off we go. Come on you Gunners!

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Wednesday, May 06, 2009


You Do The Moth

Burial and Four Tet have collaborated on a 12″ release, each apparently having had a hand in the production of each others tracks; a fantastic 'style-meld' from two of my favourite producers.

‘Moth’ is the most immediate with huge deep kicks and detuned synths and vocal shards - Burial house anyone?



‘Wolf Cub’ definitely has more of a Four Tet feel to the instrumentation but with those South London late-night atmospherics lending an uneasy air to proceedings.



Anyway, I suggest you buy it. Now. Go on!

(via nialler9)

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Friday, April 24, 2009


Cliff

No, not the leathery perma-tanned Centre Court crooner but a beautiful track from my man-of-the-week Mike Skinner.

And the video is very clever; I leave it to you to spot why (OK, think 'Memento'):



(Also for Tim at 7amkickoff - enjoy!)

Labels: , ,

3 Comments:

At April 24, 2009 6:46 PM, OpenID 7amkickoff said:

Neat! I didn't know what Mike Skinner looks like.

/thanks for the shout out as well, fourstar!

 
At April 25, 2009 12:14 AM, Blogger Fragrant Liar said:

Cool video. I liked the music and the changes in the room and in the singer. What kept bothering me more and more was that the longer the guy's beard got, the more his bad teeth showed up! Now why is that?

 
At April 28, 2009 3:27 AM, Blogger Summer said:

Love this video,cool.;D
Hope to see more from you.

http://www.soloden.com

 

Add comment

<< Home

Sunday, April 05, 2009


The Prodigy Are Fags*

No, they really are, look:



Great video :)

* Oh come on, I thought that was quite good...

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At April 08, 2009 11:27 AM, Blogger Robert McIntosh said:

that is actually very disturbing on many, many levels.

not at all sure I know what they are trying to say, or encourage.

very odd indeed

 

Add comment

<< Home

Monday, March 30, 2009


Go For The Juggler

OK, so Eduardo's cheeky volley was good, but this lot are incredible:



Pros: The opposition would never get the ball off them.
Cons: They'd spend the entire match in the centre circle.

(via the quite interesting qikipedia)

Labels: , ,

2 Comments:

At March 30, 2009 7:38 PM, Blogger Thomas Rooney said:

Amazing ball skills!

Top site by the way. Would you be able to email me when you get the chance?

Thanks a lot,

Thomas

 
At March 31, 2009 11:08 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

"Would you be able to email me when you get the chance?"

Do I know you?

 

Add comment

<< Home

Wednesday, February 25, 2009


Skream In For The Kill

I recently heard this on Mad Decent radio and Sinden's podcast, gave it props on blip.fm, which instantly Twittered it and now I'm embedding the YouTube on my blog. How ridiculously Web2.0 is that?


(I also just discovered the improvements to YouTube embedding: customised playback area, choice of sizes and optional 'related videos' strip. Much better :)

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

At February 26, 2009 4:05 PM, Blogger Belle said:

You sound like you know what you are talking about. Will you come over and re-design my website for me. For free. I will make you green tea and stroke your curly blonde hair while you do it?

 
At February 27, 2009 10:42 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

Ah. At this point, I feel I should confess that I'm not a natural blonde.

 
At March 02, 2009 10:35 PM, Blogger Clair said:

That's the daughter of June Ackland off of The Bill, y'know.

 
At March 03, 2009 11:00 AM, Blogger fourstar said:

Tsk, Clair - been reading popbitch again when you are supposed to be working in your new and exciting job?

And do we think June Ackland is a natural blonde?

 

Add comment

<< Home

Friday, January 23, 2009


Back In Your Boxxy

Feel free to ignore this post if you are over the age of fifteen, or have a life, or both. It will make no sense to you. Run away now.

*waits*

OK? Anyone still here? Right then...


The same internet machine that could propel you to the top of the Youtube charts and hand you online fame will happily chew you up and spit you back out just as quickly, with zero remorse or consideration for the consequences. This is the reality of the internet today, this case is not the first, and surely not the last. Catie, at least, well and truly learnt the power of the world wide web. Somehow, I doubt that will be of much consolation to her.
Utterly. Bonkers.

Labels: , , ,

2 Comments:

At January 23, 2009 2:33 PM, Blogger Dazzla said:

From the comments:

"Best. Story. EVER.."

Someone needs to get out more.

ps: is it bad that I hardly understood a word?

 
At January 23, 2009 4:23 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

It's a relief that you hardly understood a word.

 

Add comment

<< Home

Friday, January 16, 2009


Darth, Like, Whatever

Some chap in Texas realised that his friend had never seen the Star Wars trilogy, but reckoned she knew enough of the plot to narrate it. Being a comic artist and animator, he then put this together, as you do:


The "counselor" (sic) and also the extended "Han/Hans" debate did make me chuckle :)

(via Neatorama)

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

At January 16, 2009 9:24 AM, Blogger Nick Ollivère said:

That is very good. I have a feeling my girlfriend's summary would probably be worse.

This is also very funny:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_qEWhrjYg_o

 

Add comment

<< Home

Tuesday, January 06, 2009


MacBook Wheel

This is amazing. Apple has introduced a revolutionary new laptop with no keyboard, based around the iPod 'click wheel' system of navigation. This could revolutionise the user interface as we know it:




Very good, Mr. Onion.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Monday, December 15, 2008


Benny Who?

UPDATE: IT NOW SPEEDS THEM UP!!!!

It's a bit dark, but this makes me smile:

Freyja gets Benny Hillified


(and you too can 'Benny Hillify' any YouTube video here.

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Friday, November 21, 2008


Kung Pong?

This is great:



Quite what it has to do with a mobile phone is somewhat debatable, but still, nice work :)

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Wednesday, November 19, 2008


PythonTube

Brilliant idea. Who would have thought it, eh? Fans of your oeuvre might want a place to go to get high-quality versions of your archived work. Amazing. Yes, we might even click a few ads and buy a few DVDs, T-shirts and the like.


Now, if you wouldn't mind going and having a quiet word with the buffoons at the RIAA...

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Thursday, October 16, 2008


Rhapsody In Blue And White Stripes

Another fantastic Danny Baker moment - a version of Queen's Bohemian Rhapsody with every word replaced by a footballer's name. Why? Just because. Listen:








Update: since I bothered to edit the MP3 down, there is now a YouTube version with video and everything:


All together now "Cousins Sealey Mathers ... Pugh Geeeeee".

Brilliant. People are staring at me in the office, chuckling like a simpleton.

Labels: , , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Tuesday, October 14, 2008


At De End Of Der Day

This guy is hilarious, I really like 'Squeaky' Stevie G and the fact that it's apparently been recorded in Lidl:



Actually, Lidl sounds like it should be a Scouse dialect; perhaps a particularly obscure one from the less-leafy bits of Toxteth.
Eh, what's up with 'im? Calm down, he's just talking that Lidl (and that).

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Thursday, September 18, 2008


Aphex Twin Girl

I'm sure this is all over the intertubes, but it's very cool (and just the sort of thing I'd like to try with Freyja, if I ever get any free time whatsoever again :)


Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Monday, September 15, 2008


French Orelsan

J'aime ceci beaucoup:

Anyone who can rhyme "tetes des jeunes" with "Playstation" is OK in my book :)

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Tuesday, September 09, 2008


What A Brick

This is quite charming. Only took two days, apparently:

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Sunday, August 24, 2008


Ken Lee

OK, I give up, failblog wins:


Tulibu dibu douchoo? Gesundheit!

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Sunday, August 10, 2008


Smelly Bears Seen Exiting Woods

Following on from this and this, come the (renegade) masters of the bleedin' obvious with this:


You. Don't. Say.

However, this line from the wonderfully titled Barry Slotnick (happy days at school, Barry?) I think tilts it inadvertently more towards Greg Gillis (but then again I never did finish that law degree):
“What you can’t do is substitute someone else’s creativity for your own.”
No, that would be stealing. But there is a long history of putting bits and pieces and sounds together and calling it musique concrete, no? So who decides how much is a substantial part and how much is just a relatively insignificant bit of a larger work - that has to be the courts. This could get interesting, if someone really wants to challenge him. It's not just one (highly recognisable) sample looped over and over whilst MC Thingummy does his schtick over the top - this is possibly a new genre.

Of course, if they have any brains left up their noses, they will simply do the sensible thing and clamour like mad to be part of his next compilation - think of the publicity, dudes...

Thoughts?

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Wednesday, July 16, 2008


Watch Girl Talk

After offmessage posted about the brilliant Girl Talk mashup album, 'Feed The Animals' (well worth checking out if you can still find it) there are now video versions of a couple of sections of it which have popped up on YouTube:


Very nicely done, sir.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Sunday, March 30, 2008


Wii Can Haz Football?

Blimey, this looks awesome:



Now who do I know with a Wii who lives, say, 500 yards down the road, Paul?

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Sunday, March 23, 2008


Watch! The! Football!

There are some moderately important football matches being played this afternoon so I thought this might get us in the mood:



Up the Arsenal...

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Sunday, March 16, 2008


Eee We Go Again

Whilst I generally leave the Freyja updates to Solveig, as she does them so much better than me, I couldn't help but feel I ought to bring this to the attention of my fellow gadget-loving dads (=>'dadgets'?):

Asus Eee + BBC iPlayer + cBeebies = Bye bye, Daddy; see you later.

Hang onto your Eees, chaps!

This was a public service announcement brought to you by The Concerned Dadgets Association of Great Britain.

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Add comment

<< Home

Sunday, March 09, 2008


More Galvanised Marmite, Tintin?

No, I don't know what it stands for, but I like it:


I'm thinking half a pound of Tears For Fears, with a couple of heaped tablespoons of Depeche Mode (on Mogadon) and a pinch of Talking Heads.

You?

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

At April 16, 2008 11:54 AM, Blogger Andy said:

Well. I saw them on Later and really liked 'em. The album has just arrived, I've put it on in the office and have been roundly abused ever since it started. They are, it has to be said, phillistines, but I have a feeling I'll be listening to this one at home more than at work...

 

Add comment

<< Home

Monday, February 25, 2008


Happy 25th Birthday, Eduardo

Arsenal striker Eduardo Alves da Silva is 25 today.

Rather a shame that his leg was shattered in two places on Saturday by an utterly disgraceful high tackle in the third minute from Birmingham City fuckwit* Martin Taylor**, isn't it?


If it was malicious, and he intended it, ban him for life. If it wasn't, and he is just clumsy, he shouldn't be playing in the Premier League. Most Sunday morning pub teams (and I have played for a few) wouldn't accept tackles like that from their defenders; shin high, studs up, sliding in at speed.

Contrary to many, I am placing the blame firmly at the door of Alex McLeish, Birmingham City's manager. It is almost certain that, in the dressing room before the game, he fired his payers up with the instruction to "go and let them know they've been in a game", "get yourselves in their faces early doors" and "the way to beat Arsenal is to kick them up in the air". Unfortunately, if you do that with players of obviously limited ability, people get hurt. If that is indicative of how English club managers tell their teams to play against Arsenal, maybe that European Super League isn't such a bad idea. At least the swan-diving, shirt-pulling, face-spitting Italians play decent football :)

Seriously, though, I am livid. I don't buy any of this 'freak accident' bleating from certain sections of the media (and Garth Crooks can just fuck right off, while we're here). The studs-up challenge was banned for a reason. With the number of 'potentially career ending challenges' analysed on Match Of The Day each week, you'd think the authorities might have reviewed the punishment for such atrocities and forced both clubs and players to address the idea that this is unacceptable and remove it from the game. But no, as it stands, Martin Taylor will serve the same ban as Jeremy Aliadiere got for bitch-slapping a Liverpool player that same afternoon. Thank you, the FA, the Premier League and all you bloated paté-munching FIFA/UEFA suits - I hope you're happy.

Get well, Eduardo. Soon, if possible, but fully at least.

UPDATE: Patrick Barclay in the Daily Telegraph says similar

* you will know that I rarely swear on my blog but I cannot bring myself to describe him as a 'footballer'.
** whose nickname is 'Tiny', I assume referring to his brain.

Labels: , , ,

12 Comments:

At February 25, 2008 9:42 AM, Blogger Rowan said:

the video doesn't work anymore. I've seen pictures of the break, and the point at which Taylor's foot connects with Eduardo's leg, which is quite enough, thank you.

just a point for thought; if Eduardo had ended up with merely a bruised ankle, would you still be calling for Taylor to strung up? probably not, just calling him various names and being happy with his punishment. and the majority of studs-in tackles don't result in a break, they are v v rare.

I'm of the opinion that someone shouldn't be punished more than another player because his tackle resulted in a break rather than bruising. IMO, its the intent and the application of the tackle that is punishable, not the result - rather like a professional foul, if you will.

 
At February 25, 2008 11:23 AM, Blogger fourstar said:

Thanks, I'll sort the link (or get rid of it, nasty...)

It's not that I'm calling for him to be strung up, I think we need to eradicate the studs-in tackle from the game altogether, from bruising to compound fractures.

So yes, I therefore agree with your last point, in that the punishment should be consistent, but I think it should be much, much heavier for this kind of foul. It might take a bit of time, seeing as it is so ingrained into the English game, but if players were going to be missing for weeks rather than days, managers might think twice before condoning it.

 
At February 25, 2008 11:54 AM, Blogger Rowan said:

don't they have the ability to make a ban last longer than the usual 3 games? maybe all dangerous tackles should be submitted to the FA disciplinary committee as a matter of course.

anyway, a v bad result of a dangerous tackle whatever.

 
At February 25, 2008 11:57 AM, Blogger fourstar said:

That is a good question; where does a red card foul stop and dangerous play (a la Ben Thatcher on Pedro Mendes) begin. If the referee has been seen to deal with it at the time, does the panel have any say over length of ban? I'm sure this will be clarified in the media over the coming days...

 
At February 26, 2008 2:53 PM, Blogger Chris said:

if i may just play devil's advocate here for a moment (me? what a surprise!). whilst it was obviously a horrible, dangerous tackle, the idea that the player should be banned for life, or that it this incident is due to the frequently wenger-espoused theory that other teams can't compete with arsenal so they kick them, is, i think, a bit over the top.

such incidents are a regrettable part of football. the rules exist to try and prevent them, but ultimately, in the heat of the moment, terrible misjudgements are made. as you are no doubt aware, there have been 3 or 4 such incidents since the "orginal" david busst 12 years ago. Alan Smith and Cisse being the highest profile (and incidentally both are still playing at a high level - your opinion on newcastle notwithstanding). There doesn't seem to be a anything to suggest that this happens to arsenal more often than anybody else and in fact arsenal players are just as guilty of dangerous play - take Flamini's petulant 15 ft lunge at Nani in the FA cup, arguably a worse tackle due to the obvious intent and one of your "potentially career ending challenges" analysed on MOTD. or any of eboue's rasher moments. the point is that whilst players often decide to try a "strong" challenge, i would argue there are probably no cases where a player sets out to cause such a horrific injury. they are a sad fact of footballing life and as ever, mr "rent-a-quote" wenger has done a good deal of stirring which in this case is totally inappropriate. making the same comments in 4 different interviews is not "in the heat of the moment" and if you have to "retract" what you say, that means you know you should be apologising and don't have the balls. hope eduardo recovers as quickly as Cisse did and i hope referees start applying the laws more consistantly so players know they have no chance of getting away with even trying that sort of challenge. but when they do - witch hunts help no one and arsene making press mileage out of it is, to me, almost as distasteful as the incident itself.

 
At February 26, 2008 10:26 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

I'm sorry (no, I'm not really) and yes, I know you're playing devil's advocate, but I completely disagree with your "regrettable part of football" idea. There is no need for that kind of tackle; end of story. It simply cannot be a "terrible misjudgement" to go in studs up, shin high. So, by increasing the level of punishment, both players and managers will have to take a good look at their tactics and decide whether it is worth losing a key member of your squad for a long part of the season. Yes, of course I include Arsenal in that; Flamini, Eboué and the rest would all have to abide by the rules. I want it out of the game, not just out of our opponents armoury.

Also, surely the three you mention were genuine freak accidents; David Busst collided with Irwin in the 6-yard box, Alan Smith was caught off the ground (unwisely) blocking a Riise free kick and Cissé got his studs caught in the pitch. I think I would be right in saying that in none of those cases was anyone sent off. That, to me, seems rather important here.

Putting aside the "banned for life" bit, which was heat of the moment, whatever you may think, I think it does take balls to retract a comment, especially in the partisan world of top level football. Today's news is tomorrow's chip-paper; you can wait for it to blow over if you fancy, and it generally will. I don't think it is a witch hunt at all, certainly not against Martin Taylor (who, to his credit, has asked to be able to visit Eduardo when the latter feels it is appropriate) but it very much now falls to the FA to listen to the less hysterical parts of the media (James Lawton in the Independent springs to mind) and decide whether the future of the game would be better served without this kind of dangerous, unsportsmanlike challenge.

Fair?

 
At February 27, 2008 10:14 AM, Blogger fourstar said:

Goodplaya also speaks some sense on this issue.

Sense + FA = DOES NOT COMPUTE!

 
At February 27, 2008 1:35 PM, Blogger Chris said:

> Fair?

oh absolutely. and i don't mean to imply that just because they are a "part of football" that we shouldn't make every effort to minimise such tackles or that there shouldn't be appropriate penaties for reckless tackles. what i mean is there will always be the possibility of such an occurance no matter what the rules or particular intention of a player.

and you're right, the injuries i mentioned were not as a result of dangerous tackles, but in a way that's also my point (and i'm dangerously close to agreeing with Rowan here): you see a lot of tackles like the one that taylor made, but injuries like this are very rare, and when they do happen, it's just as likely to be a freakish accident.

anyway - it was only really St Wenger the Blind that wound me up as i happened to catch all 4 different versions of his now rightly retracted comments.

 
At February 27, 2008 2:13 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

> there will always be the possibility of such an occurance

And the chance of such an injury would be lessened if people didn't make dangerous tackles. Out of the four we mentioned, one was a dangerous tackle, so removing that possibility would reduce the chances of such an injury by 25%.

Yeah, I know that's not how the math(s) works in real life, but hey! this is the internet :)

 
At February 27, 2008 2:40 PM, Blogger Alex Andronov said:

The ref creates a really odd situation in football because if he decides something then the FA can't wade in afterwards (or not easily).

As an impartial observer I often hear the two sides arguing along the lines of "ban him" and "the FA can't do anything because it would undermine the ref".

Fine it stops rash judgements and "banned for life" situations. But somehow it always seems to stop anything changing too.

Why can't the FA say, "we aren't going to ban Martin Taylor because the the rules weren't clear. But not this tragedy has happened we want to make it clear from here forward that you'll get automatically banned for a season if you tackle somebody and your foot causes their bones to no longer be inside their legs".

Or perhaps you could ban the player for the same length of time as recovery takes?

 
At February 27, 2008 8:25 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

That last idea is a great one - until you realise that unscrupulous teams would have even more reason to feign injury and get a man sent off, thus banning him until the 'injured' player deems himself fit to play again. Sling on your worst centre back with 5 mins to go, go down in a heap, Ronaldo/Fabregas/Gerrard/Lampard sent off for nothing, misses...oooh...the rest of the season, if they fancy.

OK, so the FA could appoint doctors to check on the health of the....it gets a bit complicated, don't it :)

But I did like it at first!

 
At February 27, 2008 8:28 PM, Blogger fourstar said:

Martin Samuel also talking sense in The Times.

 

Add comment

<< Home